?

Log in

this is my life and freedom's my profession
21 August 2012 @ 05:20 pm
There are so many things wrong with Todd Akin that I'm not sure I know where to even start... so I'll start here.

Let's go ahead and assume the term "legitimate rape" was supposed to be forceful, as to distinguish it from "statutory rape". So let's just be nice and take that leap. Even though this question has been asked of all pro-life candidates since 1970s.

The next statement incurred the belief that women somehow have the ability to emit anti-sperm space ships (I assume looking much like the ones in the Family Guy episode in which the Stewy sperm shoots down all the others) in order to protect themselves from an unwanted pregnancy after an unwanted (excuse me, legitimate) rape. Now, I'm not a doctor... so I decided to look it up to see if that was true. Much to my surprise, women do not, in fact, emit anti-sperm ships in order to defend themselves from legitimate rape sperm. I was sadly shocked and dismayed, because that did kind of sound awesome.

But because Mr. Akin's, for whatever reason, believes this, the conclusion then is that any woman who becomes pregnant must have wanted the sex, and therefore could not have been raped. Because apparently, in Mr. Akin's strange world of science (who actually is on the "Committee on SCIENCE, Space and Technology"), rape doesn't cause one to become pregnant. Only consensual sex does. So the pregnancy is all the evidence we need to determine if rape happened or not. It's THAT easy!

That being said, such shameful, ignorant and "biologically stupid" (thanks Reince Priebus!) things probably costed the Republicans the majority in the Senate. But as much as I think Senator McCaskill is ignorant, shrill and generally uninteresting and unproductive, after the last few days, I'm really not sure the Republicans deserve to have the majority if that is the kind of candidates they feel are appropriate to field.

The Republicans have had a bad reputation of being anti-woman only a few decades after they gave them the right to vote (rude, no?). And instances like this don't help any. Because really, had Mr. Akin simply said "I don't believe in abortions even if someone had been forcibly raped and my biology skills aren't quite up to par, but I'm pretty sure a woman has a less chance of getting preggers if it was raped", I don't think it would have been as big of a deal, even though all of that is pretty crazy and exactly what he said.

Which is part of the cusp of the GOP's problem with women. You have old men like Akin, who don't know what being pregnant means, don't know what it's like to get raped, and don't know what it's like to be raped, become pregnant from said rape, and then being told the law says if you terminate the pregnancy YOU are a criminal, making laws that regard BOTH of those things.

Let us hope this is an eye-opening account to Republicans, many of whom believe and fight for women to have to carry a baby as the product of rape to term, and told it's criminal to do otherrwise, that forcing a woman to do that is, essentially having to face the rape again, every day, for 9 months.

I think we can all certainly agree abortion is a terrible thing. But so is being raped. I think it in our best interests to do all we can to curb the cycle of sexual violence, to allow all things which deter abortions, and also live with some compassion for victims of terrible things and perhaps allow them to have some say in what they want, rather than have a domineering presence forcing them to do yet another thing they didn't consent to.
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
28 October 2010 @ 11:41 am
Hey DPers!

I think you all should totally come down to Alberta Street Public House tonight for Chervona's French-Russian Friendship Party, featuring Russian Punks Chervona and French flamanco gypsies Dgiin!

I'll also be DJing French and Russian music, and of course any requests you have (if I have it, I play it!) -- starts around 8:30pm with vodka and champagne specials all night long.

More info here if yer interested.

 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
22 March 2010 @ 12:53 pm


Oh so pretty!
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
15 March 2010 @ 05:55 pm
Hello friends in LJ Land!

I'm DJing on St. Patrick's Day for the Red Elvises at Dantes!

You should all come and see the show! And Me! And I'll be throwing down all kinds of rad stuff. A bit surfy... a bit Irish. Who the fuck knows?!
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
27 February 2010 @ 05:04 pm
I'm sorry I wasn't a better friend.

I hope this song finds you well.

 
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
26 February 2010 @ 02:39 pm
Watching this Healthcare Summit 2010 got me thinking....

What the bloody hell is wrong with Congress?

You have two sides who have some fundamental differences. Fine, whatever. Welcome to politics. You also have many things in which no one disagrees on ANYTHING. Well, maybe five or ten, but by and large, no disagreements.

So whyyy whyyyy whyyyyy can't we put the things we agree with in separate bills and pass this shit tomorrow while we continuously work on things which we disagree with?

We could pass so many rad awesome cost saving measures right now. Easy-peasy. Apparently the House did that a few days ago, voting 400 something to not very many to prevent Insurance companies from being shielded against anti-Trust lawsuits. Fucking rad. Why can't we just keep doing that? Why does it all have to be one massive bill?

Well, let Uncle Xander tell you. Because it's so much harder to sneak shit into a bill that's only 50 to 200 pages long as opposed to nearly 2000. Porkfat is harder to find in a giant pig.

So what's the easier way? Shucking it into 2000+ pages. Sweet heart deals, buying senators, etc. But in a smaller bill? They are so much more apparent. SO HEAVEN FUCKING FORBID WE DO THAT.

Hey! US SENATE! HOUSE OF REPRESENTIN'!

THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
20 January 2010 @ 11:37 pm
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
12 January 2010 @ 10:35 am
"Two weeks into 2010, gang bloodshed is becoming more grotesque as drug lords ramp up their attempts at intimidation. Last week a victim's face was peeled from his skull and sewn onto a soccer ball. On Monday, prosecutors in Culiacan identified the remains of 41-year-old former police officer divided into two separate ice chests.

"You wonder how this will end, and it seems impossible," said Daniel Vega, an architect in the northern city of Monterrey. "I doubt Mexico can override drug use, especially since demand for the drugs, as well as all the money and weapons, come from the United States."

People sometimes ask me why I've never done drugs... and this is one of the reasons why
 
 
 
this is my life and freedom's my profession
21 December 2009 @ 03:30 am